Seriously - Is it that diffcult to "win" in the market?

Again and again, I come back to the same question repeatedly. I come to conclusion that it is ALL about ME, only ME and no one else.

IF and only IF, we can OBEDIENTLY belief that nothing else matter when we come to terms with the market. If we get a wrong beginning what the market is all about, than we will be lost and remain lost in the maze.

All of us will fall into the mindtrap that market is a very difficult creature to tame. More correctly this is due to the WRONG steps and path that we took at the STARTING point.

We are also loaded with the poisonous ideas about all different sorts of financial theories from the media and formal education for some of us.

Look at the decision process when we place the order to initiate OPEN position.

Before pressing the BUTTON, we have decided. Walking back, this decision is a result of some analysis which lead to BELIEFs. This BELIEF stuff is actually toxic and dangerous. Another step back, this analysis is some sort of mental exercise with some wild ideas inside our mind. One more step back, these ideas is actually a product of some material that we read and hear. 99.9% of the time it from some media or books. This is the starting point. Almost all the time, once we IDENTIFY the first door, we did not knock on different doors to check if that is the right door or not. By the time we realize that results are totally disastrous, either we come back to the starting point and explore the different doors or we resign to the fact that market is random unpredictable unfriendly. 

Each and different components of the section mentioned above need to be tested rigorousness to authenticate the validity and reliability. Allowing a wrong and defective idea to pass each different screen test will only lead to crash case.

The final product is NOT a case of a Genie asking ..Master what is your wish!!!

The final product is results of a series of steps taken from CONCEPTUAL to PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, TESTING, IMPROVEMENTS, REFINEMENT and FINISHED RELIABLE PRODUCT.

Any flaws in any of the above will end with an unreliable product. Rather than blaming the users for WRONG usage, we should check and relook if the quality test at each different stage has been compromised.

From my own personal experience, my conclusion is WE allowed a product not rigorously tested to be APPROVED!

Only if we go back to the drawing board. This time we start with experience.

I have seen and read from blogs, groups many different people coming up with all sorts of theories and ideas WHY the price should be this and that. This comments are than reinforced with the claims of such and such reasons according to blah blah blah. This proponents become aggressively DEFENSIVE especially in a losing position. Instead of accepting the flaws, they become denial.

I am not keen about the profits. These are least of an issue to me. I am very concerned and disturbed with the losses.  How to avoid them. The only way to avoid is to avoid we got a DEFECTIVE process on hand and need to be fixed.

If we do not admit the need to improve on an unreliable product, than forever we will face consumer complaints